I’m Conservative

I’m Conservative

If the word means what I think it does, then I would call myself a “conservative.” Financially, in particular, I believe that individuals and countries should save money until they can afford to spend it and must do so. I also still adhere to quaint notions like rule-following, decency, and even some old, crusty documents and traditions.

As much as anything, though, I think about the root of the word conservative not as con, but serve. (Some of you may recall that honesty, integrity, and service are in the top five on my list of seven principles for political leaders.) Therefore, I disagree vehemently with any con man (or woman) who promotes dishonest notions of “conservatism” that equate to selfservatism, if you pardon me for inventing a term.

Please bear with me as I explain, and give the words below some thought.

Conservative Crossword Answers

Although I am no cruciverbalist (which really is a word), I put together the crossword puzzle above to illustrate my thoughts on conservatism. Instead of asking you to solve the puzzle, I will discuss why each word fits my theme for this blog.

Appropriately, 1 across is conserve. A true conservative believes in conserving resources, including both natural resources and capital. Presidents and congresses who authorize more in spending than in taxes are not conservative. Presidents and congresses who ignore stewardship of the environment are not conservative.

Preserve is 2 across. In my view of politics, the Constitution of the United States of America documents the foremost ideals to be preserved. Upholding our nation’s founding document – whether it helps or hurts an immediate policy desire – is true conservatism. I’m talking about all parts of the Constitution, not just the parts that fit a particular political agenda.

With 3 across, reserve, my thought is that conservatives are people who store assets for the future benefit of others, which assets they hold in trust. Strength, be it military strength or financial strength, should be built, enhanced, and kept in reserve until truly needed.

By subserve (4 across), I am describing the act of promoting the nation’s best interests ahead of one’s own. Subservience is not popular in these days of “looking out for number one,” but it should be part of being a conservative leader. That is because subjugating personal desires for the good of all is part of being a public servant.

When I think about 5 across, the underserved, I am thinking about the principle of protecting the vulnerable, particularly children, the elderly, and others who have immutable disadvantages. Conservatives are charitable where I come from. They look out for their neighbors, particularly those less fortunate than them. In serving the underserved, a conservative government steps in when truly needed and in a way that makes the most effective use of resources for those in need.

At 6 down you see the word observe. Norms, traditions, and institutions are observed and honored by conservatives, who believe that moral norms, unifying traditions, and healthy institutions are the foundations of a successful society. Thus, trying to destroy institutions that currently are dominated by political opponents is not conservative. A federal government asserting power against selected states and cities is not conservative, in that conservatives traditionally have believed in separation of powers and states’ rights. Any government ignoring norms by engaging in lawfare, threatening political foes with arrest, stifling free speech and the press, or denying due process is not being run by genuine conservatives. Government officials engaging in corruption are not being conservative. A government thwarting democracy or overriding checks and balances dishonors the Constitution and thus is not conservative.

Deserve (7 down) is shorthand here for conservatives believing in meritocracy, not government handouts. We believe in principles of personal freedom, limited government, and free enterprise.

Lastly, by including undeserved at 8 down, I am looking for humility on the part of conservatives. We do not deserve power, riches, influence, control, or the right to oppress others. Anything we have is an unearned, undeserved gift of grace from God.

Note: Softserve ice cream did not make the crossword puzzle because it is not inherently conservative, although it is a gift and I do like it.

Service

The sharpest among you linguists already have picked up on the fact that all of the above words contain serve, which, as I noted at the outset, is the root of conservatism. The Judeo-Christian faith, to which so-called “evangelicals” and others often link their so-called “conservative” political ideologies, is based on belief in God and in service to others.

A true conservative politician is here to serve, above all else.

Written by Quentin R. Wittrock, founder of Principle Based Politics. 

Look for his periodic posts, as this blog and the Extremely Non-Extreme podcast  explores and promotes the ideas of principles and non-extremism in politics.

Principle Based Politics does not endorse or support any particular political candidate or party.

14 Comments
  • James Loerts
    Posted at 12:30h, 21 October

    Just when I though the RINO side of you had squeezed out all rational common sense you write a post that exemplifies the ideals to which we should all aspire. I am ashamed I previously doubted. Good job.

    • Quentin
      Posted at 22:19h, 21 October

      I’m sure today’s post will be taken by some readers as proof of my continued RINOness and its accompanying absence of “all rational common sense.” And that is fine with me.

  • Dave Glesne
    Posted at 13:15h, 21 October

    Thank you, Quentin. I am grateful for this articulation of your principled stance – which you not only articulate well but live out in practice.

    • Quentin
      Posted at 22:19h, 21 October

      That’s very kind of you, Dave. Thank you.

  • Darren Knight
    Posted at 17:07h, 21 October

    Your TDS is still on display, even though a certain president’s name was not mentioned in your post. The “norms” that you wish to continue to follow have led us to this place. $37 Trillion or some similarly crazy number in debt, powerful institutions completely controlled by one party, extreme/unhealthy polarization between red rural areas and deep blue cities, socialists v. dems running for offices in blue areas, political violence on the rise, etc., etc. You aspire to high ideals that are utterly unrealistic. We are never going to find or elect someone who fulfills the second coming of the Lord. It is time for real change. Government must be controlled. The dangers of leftism/socialism must be explained and understood. A libertarian/populist/conservative blend is the best. The same old, same old, which is espoused in your post above, isn’t going to work. You are promoting the same old positions of Bush, McCain, Romney, George Will, Bill Krystol, David Brooks–these people–together with institutions controlled by the Dems–have brought us here. They are all wrong. We don’t want to be France or Britain–or something farther left and much worse. We want the limited government, constitutional republic, that has dominated the world. Hoping for or even seeking something warm and fuzzy and pure–it’s not the real world. Good Luck.

    • Quentin
      Posted at 22:16h, 21 October

      I always enjoy your comments, Darren. Thank you. When you say Bush et al and unnamed “institutions…have brought us here,” I think you must be referring to “here” as where our country stood in 2015. My basis for saying so is that the driving force “bring us here (circa October 2025)” is the current president of the U.S. He has been the dominant and controlling political and cultural figure for the last ten years now, and he/his followers should get the credit or blame for “here” where we have been “brought.” So, if you are unhappy with whre America stands today, I don’t think you can pin that on Bush, McCain, Romeny, George Will, Bill Krystol, David Brooks, or any institutions dominated by anyone except Mr. Trump. On the other hand, if you are happy with where we stand today, the logic of your argument should be leading you to satisfaction.

  • Trudy Johnson
    Posted at 17:14h, 21 October

    Fabulous read – you and I are on the SAME PAGE Quentin. James Loerts – I agree with a laugh!! : )

    • Quentin
      Posted at 22:21h, 21 October

      Oh no, are you saying I’m copying off your ideas page, Trudy? I didn’t even do that in high school!;)

  • DKnight
    Posted at 23:49h, 21 October

    In response to your response to my post–I suggest going back to way before 2015. The institutional takeover and associated corruption/rot, has been brewing for decades. Trump challenges all of that conventional wisdom. All of this pre-dates Orange Man. He is so hated by those on the left, because, unlike Bush/Romney et al.–he challenges the standard orthodoxy. In his first administration, he was hamstrung from day 1. In round two, he is more familiar with the terrain and even more of a threat to the status quo. This current shutdown is a great example. We are Zillions in debt–and the Dems won’t pass the same overripe/over spending budget that they passed under Biden. We have become too divided and too top heavy, with giant government leading the way. Remember, the Dems/Mainstream Media (except FOX)/College professors and teacher’s unions, etc.–despise all republicans–not just Trump. If it was a different republican–he or she would still be labeled as a nazi/racist, blah blah. We need a sea change back to the world of limited government and responsibility. Only a disrupter can bring about the ship–which was been sailing in the wrong direction since Bush the younger–or even earlier. This is tough work–for whomever is in charge. It may get a lot worse, depending on the midterms and 2028.

    • Quentin
      Posted at 00:00h, 22 October

      I interpret your response to be: (1) things are really bad in America, (2) it’s been that way for decades, (3) Trump has not been able to improve the situation despite being president 5 of the last 9 years, and (4) that’s the fault of people (including Democrats, institutions, and previous Republicans) other than Trump. We better go to lunch so you can explain that to me.

  • Dknight
    Posted at 04:26h, 22 October

    We are lucky to live in America. Things are fine in our cushy suburbs…but that is deceptive. Mammoth deficits and societal problems can take a long time to materialize. Be clear eyed and honest about where we are. Our divisive situation has been coming for a long while. And, yes, the leftist tilt is a big reason why.

  • Jonah Heuer
    Posted at 06:07h, 22 October

    Your point about observing traditions and norms in relation to Trump trying to impose law and order on blue cities seems backwards.
    Which is more normal: municipalities instirutionalizing lawlessness, or the Executive enforcing the law? No city has the right to be a “sanctuary” for criminals.

    • Quentin
      Posted at 13:10h, 22 October

      That’s a close call, Jonah. Thank you for pointing out this issue. I often go back to two wrongs not making a right. If someone else violates a norm, is it right to violate another norm in response?

  • Gary Russell
    Posted at 14:38h, 22 October

    Each time this debate comes up about “harboring criminals” we seem to dance around the core issue. Of course, most “left” people want to enforce laws. And of course, most “right” people don’t want to deport everyone of color. We often get stuck in that argument. The core issue is how to treat folks in the country who crossed the border without getting all the legalities covered (i.e., undocumented)? Did they “cut in line” ahead of others? I don’t think we’ll all agree even on that point…but it’s where we should start and then work out something sensible without the labels of “racism” vs. “soft on crime” as if you are one or the other.