11 Oct Honesty
If this were a Seven Summits list, honesty would be Mount Everest. Honesty sits at the very top of our list of principles for federal leaders.
Principle Based Politics was formed to spread the idea that reliance on principles will lead to reasonable, rational federal policies that will help the American people. The principle of honesty as a “base” for political decisions and actions requires leaders who will be truthful always, as well as forthcoming with true information.
Honesty may have been so fundamental, so obvious to the authors of our Declaration of Independence and the framers of the Constitution of the United States that they did not even feel the need to mention it. Indeed, none of the grievances giving rise to the Declaration were that the King was lying to the colonists. None of the aspects of “a more perfect Union” so eloquently described in the Preamble to the Constitution referenced a more honest or transparent union, and the three co-equal facets of government laid out in Articles I, II, and III omitted the honesty branch. No constitutional amendment has explicitly required openness or truthfulness from the government.
The Bible seems more inclusive, with its commandment that “Thou shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor,” but even that passage is not exactly setting forth leadership principles for federal officials. The biblical quotation, from the Ten Commandments, does codify a law, however. It therefore provides an excellent jumping off point for a look at where honesty is much discussed—in our American legal system, particularly our judicial process.
Our judicial branch provides an entire genre of writings that should help our citizens recognize leaders who adhere to the principle of honesty. Just a sampling of the many examples of lawsuit categories that implicate honesty includes perjury, fraud, deceit, defamation, and tax evasion. Your blogger, who once presented a legal seminar ironically titled “The Honest Lawyer,” is not simply reporting these terms just in case you will be taking the bar exam soon. The point is that they all apply to the politicians we see on our ballots and holding the offices to which we elect them.
For example, presidents and congresspeople take an oath of office, and we can evaluate the extent to which they honor it fully. They also sometimes make sworn statements to law enforcement during investigations, and we can determine whether those are true or are perjurious, as well. Misleading campaign statements are fraud if intended to induce reliance by the voting public. Promises on the campaign trail, by the same token, are deceitful if the candidate does not intend to follow through. False accusations to hurt an opponent are a form of defamation. Tax evasion by a politician can occur literally in the filing of tax returns, or by analogy when using false numbers or omitting true ones in speaking to the public. These examples are all too familiar.
There is a reason the above legal constructs exist. Each provides a jury some guidance on how to decide who wins and who loses in a court of law. To complete our analogy, just as jurors judge the believability of witnesses, we, the voting populace, sitting as the jury deciding who wins and who loses an election, should hold candidates to the same standard of honesty.
Just as peace means more than the absence of war, honesty means more than not lying. Honesty entails a willingness to divulge information.
Forthcoming politicians can be identified by the robustness of their conflict-of-interest disclosures, the completeness of the medical and income tax records they provide, and the readiness to relate “bad news” when the country needs to know it. When bills are being proposed, the honest and forthcoming leader frankly will reveal and explain the costs associated with the new law.
When providing facts on a “need to know” basis, these political leaders will realize that we actually do need to know. We need to know the truth. Always.
Written by Quentin R. Wittrock, founder of Principle Based Politics.
Look for his posts each week, as this blog will explore and promote the idea of principle in politics, both as to individual elected leaders and our federal government as an institution.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.